it is obvious to me at this point. the united states has already captured osama bin laden. they have probably always had him. but even if not:
having taken my clues from the facts on the ground, i drew a direct route to this conclusion: bin laden is doing karl rove's bidding.
it would require a tremendous amount of disbelief for the average person to conclude Mr. Rove, politico extraordinaire, would not use bin laden's capture to win in the 2006 election.
re enactment of rove's thought process in 2006: "so we'll hit them with a bin laden video on the sunday before the election of 2006, then we'll hit them with a bin laden video on september 11, 2007 when general petraeus gives his report to the Congress: three huge news items occur on the same day as 9/11. then before the election of 2008 we will announce that we finally caught bin laden. bush with that "history's teacher" he'll keep talking about will be vindicated."
i remember somewhere in the folklore of mormon theology a professed time of secret combinations, and conspiracies against men. what is it when a conspiracy theorist theorizes an actual conspiracy?
why is petraeus giving his report on iraq to the senate on 9/11/07?
there are a few required things for my conspiracy theory to be true:
-karl rove has patience.
-bin laden knows he is caught.
two things remain undecided:
-has karl rove been really working for dick cheney all along?
-if so, does bush know or not know.
tell me why i am wrong.